Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
In a FLR, there’s an intriguing truth that many men secretly long for deep down, they don’t want their mistress to give them the chance to ejaculate. (Ejaculation and orgasm are two different things) It may seem surprising, but the reasons behind it are deeply connected to intimacy, trust, and devotion.
For many men, surrendering control over their cock and balls to a woman they care for brings them closer to her. When she lovingly takes the reins, he can focus entirely on her needs, her desires, and the pleasure he can bring her. Giving up the control of something as personal as his orgasm isn’t about denying him, it’s about deepening his devotion, making every moment together more meaningful.
Focusing on his ejaculation at any point in lovemaking just cheapens the whole experience. If ejaculation or a ruined release or prostate milking is to be used, it has to have it's own occasion and she decides when it's going to happen. Personally I don't prefer schedules releases. It's way better if I decide it and only let him know a few hours beforehand. Another trick is to have him orgasm with minimal stimulation which is a whole another topic to go into.
If the dynamics involve being in chastity, choosing to remain caged rather than experience the brief pleasure of ejaculation. The longing for release becomes so insignificant compared to the intense desire to be owned by her. Having his balls full and knowing it feels better that way than it would if they were empty, just for momentary pleasure, is far more fulfilling. It paves way for a deeper intimacy and connection in the relationship.
So all in all, ejaculation is not necessary and if it can be avoided altogether, it's way better. At least in my opinion.
Posted : 10/11/2024 12:51 am
In a FLR, there’s an intriguing truth that many men secretly long for deep down, they don’t want their mistress to give them the chance to ejaculate. (Ejaculation and orgasm are two different things) It may seem surprising, but the reasons behind it are deeply connected to intimacy, trust, and devotion.
For many men, surrendering control over their cock and balls to a woman they care for brings them closer to her. When she lovingly takes the reins, he can focus entirely on her needs, her desires, and the pleasure he can bring her. Giving up the control of something as personal as his orgasm isn’t about denying him, it’s about deepening his devotion, making every moment together more meaningful.
Focusing on his ejaculation at any point in lovemaking just cheapens the whole experience. If ejaculation or a ruined release or prostate milking is to be used, it has to have it's own occasion and she decides when it's going to happen. Personally I don't prefer schedules releases. It's way better if I decide it and only let him know a few hours beforehand. Another trick is to have him orgasm with minimal stimulation which is a whole another topic to go into.
If the dynamics involve being in chastity, choosing to remain caged rather than experience the brief pleasure of ejaculation. The longing for release becomes so insignificant compared to the intense desire to be owned by her. Having his balls full and knowing it feels better that way than it would if they were empty, just for momentary pleasure, is far more fulfilling. It paves way for a deeper intimacy and connection in the relationship.
So all in all, ejaculation is not necessary and if it can be avoided altogether, it's way better. At least in my opinion.
I absolutely agree with you, Mistress.
Advertisement
Posted : 10/11/2024 7:51 pm
Nika and William_PeSN reacted
In an FLR/WLM setup, a guy’s orgasm should be entirely out of his hands. He shouldn’t expect it just because he’s pleased her. @nika, you’re absolutely right.
Posted : 10/11/2024 9:45 pm
Focusing on his ejaculation at any point in lovemaking just cheapens the whole experience. If ejaculation or a ruined release or prostate milking is to be used, it has to have it's own occasion and she decides when it's going to happen. Personally I don't prefer schedules releases. It's way better if I decide it and only let him know a few hours beforehand. Another trick is to have him orgasm with minimal stimulation which is a whole another topic to go into.
This is excellent! I have, more often than not, begged my Mistress Wife to not allow me to orgasm or ejaculate, even thought I really wanted to. I also agree wholeheartedly with you that it is way better when you (she) decides if and when he can ejaculate, whether or not she decides to let him know a few hours beforehand. If she does let him, she always has the ability to change her mind and tell him no.
Posted : 13/11/2024 9:11 am
even when vanilla I loved the taste and the reaction to a woman cumming.. I can not imagine most men are not the same
Posted : 18/11/2024 12:30 pm
