Some think that submission and weakness are synonyms but they couldn't be more different. Submission does not equal weakness, especially when we’re talking about submissive men in female-led relationships (FLRs). The stereotypical portrayal of the submissive man—often imagined in porn as a sniveling, desperate figure groveling at the feet of a dominant woman—doesn’t even come close to capturing the depth of what submission really is. Sure, some people get a kick out of that dynamic in a scene or as a kink, but in real life? That’s not sustainable, nor is it what FLRs are truly about.
Real submission goes far beyond those extreme and exaggerated fantasies. It’s not about being some kind of doormat—it’s about strength, trust, and purpose. In fact, submitting can be one of the most empowering and fulfilling things a man can do. When done right, it’s a sign of strength—not weakness.
Submission requires trust and risk, placing your trust in someone else can be a good thing, but it's not without its risks. Taking a risk and accepting leadership from someone is a conscious, calculated effort and having the strength to accept leadership is a sign of strength.
Now, society often tells men that strength means being in control—always calling the shots, never showing vulnerability, and always leading. But let’s flip the script for a second. What if true strength doesn’t lie in holding tightly to control? What if it’s actually about knowing when to let go and trust someone else to take the reins?
Being vulnerable? It’s scary. But it’s also incredibly courageous. Let’s face it—letting someone else take charge, opening yourself up to another person, and saying, “I trust you,” takes guts. That’s strength right there.
For many men, the idea of embracing submission is tied to a deep fear of appearing weak. But let’s be real: that fear is rooted in outdated stereotypes of masculinity that tell men they should never show vulnerability. The truth is, men want guidance, support, and even praise from their partners—but they’ve been conditioned to believe that wanting those things makes them weak. It doesn’t. It makes them human.…
5
1
I love this post and I understand it but it doesn’t explain exactly the process of how he benefits. It says men feel fulfilled – how? Men don’t just want to serve another person. They have their own wishes, their own needs outside of the relationship and their own needs for independence too. He has his own dreams and objectives. If all the man does is to serve her needs, none of the above needs are being met.
How does serving her help him see his friends?
How does serving her allow him to enjoy his own hobbies?
How does serving her allow him to make spontaneous decisions?
How does serving her allow him to work towards his dreams if those dreams don’t align with her?
It seems to me he’s a dog on a leash, no matter how gentle the leash is and how kind and loving his wife or gf is holding the leash. He’s in a cage, albeit a gilded one filled with comforts and love. He might be a loyal protector but so is a loyal guard dog. They’re treated with love, care and respect too but it doesn’t change that that they’re just objects being used to serve a purpose to their owner. It seems to me that a man who submits would be the same?
I get that it takes strength and power to submit and trust and IMO it’s very true. However I’m hoping someone could explain to me, sell to me as it were, what advantages there are to me personally of an FLR? It seems to me all the advantages are with the lady. Yes I’d get love, intimacy, support and being appreciated but assuming I’d find a good woman, I’d get that from her in an equal relationship too.
In additional FLR seems so open to abuse. I have a history of suffering trauma at the hands of my mom as a child and then at the hands of my ex wife when she suffered post partum psychosis. I’m terrified of suffering this again and if I hand over everything to a woman and she uses and abuses me, where does that leave me? I’d have no assets as they’d be in her name. I’d have no money as she’d have it all? The house and the car would be in her name. I wouldn’t be able to leave as I’d potentially have nothing.
I’m now widowed and a single dad and I’m exploring the world as I expect I’ll be alone forever.
I’m hoping you can explain some of the above to me. I don’t mean to sound argumentative and I’m not trying to be. I’m AuDHD and I’m trying to understand the logic of it.
With all due respect, this seems like little more than wordplay. Dominance = strength. Submission = weakness. The fact that the guy in the drawing looks physically fit doesn’t change this.