Let’s talk about ladders. Not the kind you buy at Home Depot or use to clean your gutters, but the ones in our minds—the ones that shape how we rank, prioritize our relationships. I know that sounds mechanical at first, but hang with me. We do prioritize things and people in our lives. We have favorite foods, favorite movies, favorite tv shows and of course favorite people.
If you’re in a relationship with a modern marriage dynamic like mine, you’ve probably already noticed that your connection with your husband doesn’t sit on the same rung as your connection with your boyfriend. And that’s not a bad thing—it’s natural, expected even. But what’s less often explored is how these roles split into two distinct ladders: the emotional ladder and the sexual ladder.
With emotional connection comes safety—the deep, grounding reassurance that we are loved, seen, and accepted. It’s the warm blanket of trust that allows us to truly open up. And with sexual connection comes play—the spark, the thrill, the space where we flirt, explore, and rediscover ourselves and each other. In many traditional marriages, both emotional and sexual intimacy are nurtured within the same relationship, creating a powerful fusion of safety and play.
In modern marriage dynamics, these connections can come from two distinctly different people—one partner offering emotional depth and stability, while another brings sexual excitement and exploration. Neither approach is wrong; both acknowledge the simple truth that we thrive when we feel safe and alive. Whether it’s one partner or two, it’s this dance between emotional security and erotic freedom that keeps a relationship rich, evolving, and deeply satisfying.
Introducing Ladder Theory
If you’ve been around relationship psychology of any kind, you might have heard of Ladder Theory. In its original form, it’s a bit simplistic and maybe even reductive. It suggests that men see women on one ladder—based largely on attractiveness and sexual availability—while women see men on two ladders: one for friendship and one for romance/sex.
But I want to remix the female side of that and apply it to modern, more nuanced relationships, especially those involving balancing relationships with multiple partners. The emotional ladder and sexual ladder don’t just exist in general—they exist separately for each partner you have.
Yes, that means your husband can be your top pick emotionally but sit a rung or two lower on your sexual ladder. And your boyfriend? He might rule the sexual ladder like a god, but his feet may be planted firmly on the floor when you’ve had a rough day or need to vent about your mom’s latest Facebook rant.
The key idea? There are two ladders, and every partner occupies different positions on each one. And those positions shift—sometimes subtly, sometimes dramatically.
Husband: Primary Emotional (PE), Secondary Sexual (SS)
Let’s paint this out with a very familiar scenario in modern marriage dynamics. You love your husband. He’s your emotional rock. He knows your moods, your little tells, the way your voice changes when you’re happy, annoyed, or aroused. You cuddle with him. You confide in him. You plan your future with him.
But—sexually? Maybe he doesn’t quite scratch the itch the same way your boyfriend does. Maybe he’s smaller, less confident, more submissive (like Kev, my sweet hubby). Maybe he wants you to prioritize your pleasure with someone who truly ravishes you. So, sexually, he becomes secondary. Not because he failed, but because it serves both of you in a powerful way.
This isn’t a downgrade—it’s a designation. It’s emotionally intelligent and, dare I say, erotically evolved. Your husband becomes your primary emotional partner—the man who supports and holds space for your full self—and your secondary sexual partner, someone who participates in your sexuality in a different, often more service-oriented way. That kind of split can be beautiful, and common in modern marriage dynamics.
Boyfriend: Primary Sexual (PS), Secondary Emotional (SE)
Now swing the pendulum the other way. Your boyfriend makes you feel things. You crave him. The way he grabs your hips, looks into your eyes with that animal hunger… the sex is hot, dominant, emotionally charged—but in a different flavor.
Emotionally though? Maybe he’s not the guy you can count on when your dog is sick or your car breaks down. Maybe he’s just not wired that way—or your relationship with him hasn’t developed into a safe emotional harbor. So he sits lower on the emotional ladder.
In this setup, he’s your primary sexual partner, but your secondary emotional partner. And that works, too. It works because you’ve created the structure, because your emotional needs are met elsewhere and your erotic fire is fed here. This isn’t a failure on his part—it’s just what that connection is.
What Happens When One Partner Becomes Primary in Both?
Here’s where things get complicated—and fascinating.
Imagine your boyfriend becomes both the primary emotional and sexual partner. He fulfills you, thrills you, makes you feel safe, seen, and sore (in the best ways). So… what’s the husband now?
It’s a real question. In our minds, we want to romanticize that “every partner is special in their own way.” And yes, emotionally, we may want that to be true. But when the same man fulfills your deepest emotional needs and your primal sexual desires… what’s left for the other?
That’s not a betrayal of your husband. It’s just a matter of roles shifting. And in some FLR marriages, that does happen. The husband’s role evolves—not as a co-equal, but as a devoted supporter, a facilitator, or even a witness to your pleasure and emotional growth.
He may become your anchor, the one who holds the space for your evolution—even if he’s no longer your primary on either ladder. His specialness lies in his devotion, not his utility.
This is the essence of modern marriages at the deepest emotional level. Not just humiliation for kink’s sake, but a profound, voluntary step down the ladders—out of love.
Flip It Again: When the Husband Is Primary in Both
Let’s explore the reverse now. What if your husband is your everything—your heart, your soul, your best lay? What, then, is your boyfriend for?
Sometimes the boyfriend fades to the background. Maybe he was a phase, a sexual experiment, or a transitional person. But even if he’s not your “main guy” in either realm, he might still serve a vital but somewhat less important role.
He could be:
- A fantasy outlet. Someone you see when you crave novelty.
- A catalyst. The man who reminded you what desire feels like. While he may not be the best lay, he might make you feel like the sexiest woman on the planet.
- A mirror. Reflecting your power back to you.
- A supporting role. Someone who satisfies your need to explore, lead, dominate—or just be wanted without emotional strings.
Just because someone is “secondary” doesn’t mean they’re unimportant. Relationships aren’t zero-sum games—they’re ecosystems. And every creature in an ecosystem plays a role, even if it’s small.
Emotional and Sexual Ladders Are Not Independent
Here’s where it gets real, though. These ladders? They don’t exist in silos. I can try and oversimplify all I want but the truth is that they cross each other. Some ladders are taller than others and some are shorter.
Have amazing sex with someone long enough and emotions will sneak in, even if you tried to keep it light. Confide in someone emotionally over time and that bond can become sexy. We’re wired that way. Human connection is fluid.
And just like a parent may feel closer to one child for a short while—maybe because that child needs more, or connects more easily—it can be natural to prefer one partner over another in specific moments. This doesn’t mean you love one less. It means you’re human.
The mistake we make is assuming that preferences = permanence. They don’t. Dynamics shift. Energy flows. And that’s actually the gift of modern, honest relationships—we get to talk about it.
Making Peace With the Hierarchy
Some people flinch at the idea of hierarchy. They say it feels clinical, too rigid, too “ranking.” But here’s the truth: Hierarchy is already happening whether you name it or not.
What matters is how consciously you navigate it.
When you recognize that your husband may be your emotional home but not your sexual apex—or vice versa—you can stop pretending and start designing a relationship that works. Not one that’s based on fantasy or guilt, but one that’s honest, erotic, and emotionally sustainable.
And yes, sometimes that means your husband lovingly watches while your boyfriend takes center stage. Other times, it means thanking a lover for the ride and curling up with your husband, because he is your forever home.
It’s not betrayal. It’s balance.
So… What Makes Him Special?
If your husband isn’t your best lay or your deepest emotional high anymore, what makes him special?
It’s not always about what he gives—it’s about who he is in your life. Maybe:
- He is the man who chooses you every day, even when you’re giving your body to someone else.
- He is the partner who serves your needs, lovingly, quietly, without needing to be center stage.
- He is your foundation, your witness, your willing supporter in your erotic growth.
- He is the father of your kids and you will forever adore him for that role.
- He is the provider for you and your family, giving security both emotionally and financially.
And if the boyfriend gets demoted—sexually and emotionally—what makes him special?
Maybe:
- He’s the spark that reminded you of your fire.
- He’s the playmate who let you explore a different side of yourself.
- He’s the man who came into your life for a reason, even if not for the full ride.
The beauty of modern marriage dynamics is that we can honor all forms of special—without needing to rank one as better than the other.
Climbing Ladders
The dual ladder model gives us a language to understand the complexity of love, lust, and everything in between. We don’t need to force our partners into “one-size-fits-all” roles. Instead, we can ask: What rung do you sit on? What do you bring me? What do I bring you? And how can we grow together, even if we’re not always equal in every category?
The goal isn’t equality—it’s honesty. It’s building a relationship ecosystem where everyone is aware of their role, proud of it, and deeply valued for who they are, not who we wish they were.
Because in the end, we’re all climbing—and holding—different ladders. The magic happens when we stop pretending otherwise.
Evolving The Conversation
- Do you feel more emotionally connected to your primary sexual partner or your primary emotional partner—and why?
- How do you navigate feelings of guilt or insecurity when one partner fulfills more of your needs than another?
- Have your emotional or sexual preferences for your husband or boyfriend shifted over time? What caused the shift?
- Is it possible to consciously keep sexual and emotional hierarchies separate, or do they naturally influence each other?
- In your own relationship, how do you define what makes each partner “special”?


I could not accept being demoted on both ladders. I could never accept cuckoldry due to psychological trauma, but as a bisexual NB person I’d theorectically accept being in a throuple.
If I looked at it through the scope of a throuple, I would only agree to be in a throuple before any sexual activity took place between the theoretical 3rd person (whether that 3rd person be me joining a couple, or another person joining my existing relationship.
However if the other 2 in the throuple had demoted me to a secondary person who was no longer an equal partner emotionally or sexually then I’d see this as hurtful, disrespectful and game over because I was simply being used whether it was for my money or something else and they in essence would be cheating because I was no longer being an equal partner.
As far as a 2 person relationship goes for me, it’s black and white, as soon as I’m not my partner’s primary person then my partner is cheating.
I have to disagree with this. If the husband is devoted to the wife but the wife does not reciprocate, she is simply using him. The husband is reduced to being a resource not a person. She is using him to anchor herself, to fan her ego via his devotion, and a source of satisfaction for her. If roles were reversed and it was the man using his wife in this way like in the harems of old, it would be equally unacceptable in the modern world.
I read your blog about toxic relationships and breaking up based on that,and as soon as the husband is no longer highest on either ladder and the wife has completely moved on to someone else, the relationship has become toxic for him. His needs for love, intimacy, respect and emotional security are no longer her primary goal, ergo she doesn’t care about him and is simply using him.
The hardest part of things all kinks and alternative lifestyle I had to understand was some people are into pain emotional fiscal….. Even financial pain
You my friend are not that’s a good thing you recognize what would be painful for you and voice it in the best way you can that’s communication and is good I hope to hear more of your comments they always get me thinking 🤔
Have a epic day 👍👍
So I really like the ladders reference believe it or not that’s a good reference it helps put into words a lot of what I do when asked to help when things go south
It help me to realize what we do is help people realize they don’t need to be on the ladders they don’t need them …… This doesn’t mean that doing things this way is rong if you like it aces for you live your best life
But when you no longer feel is fair or right for you it can be a big step to get off the ladder hierarchy and stay off it
And no this doesn’t always mean brake up relationship or a end to alternative lifestyle living but to quote Emma it means evolution in the relationship
As long as both parents are able to communicate truthfully love and respect each other then there is nothing they both can’t overcome
Thanks again the ladders reference helps a lot 🙂
Wishing all the best for everyone 😎😎😎😎😎
I believe the way Emma believes. I don’t visualize the ladder system so much. People come in to your life for a reason. Let talk about Emma ( I know she will like that). Just maybe Anderw came in to Emma and Kev life to show them, yes a third person would not disrupt their relationship. Even add energy to it. Now Erik is the person that puts all pieces together for them.These two men for reason only the universe knows were meant to be involved in Emma’s and Kev relationship. People come into your life for a reason. They might stay a little bit or might stay a lifetime.
Emma I’m going to link an older blog of yours I’ve just enjoyed and I hope you or someone could offer their views or advice on it.
In The Rise of Polyandry – Part 2: What Does It Mean For Us? – Evolving Your Man how would a polyandrous non cuckold relationship deal with one man (or NB) partner becoming secondary on both ladders? I’m sure that this would cause a relationship imbalance and therefore cause resentment and misery to that partner. It’s not simply a case of he or they will simply accept becoming a third wheel in the relationship where suddenly his or their happiness is simply not prioritised by her any more.
As I wrote in my other comment below I simply cannot envision someone accepting being used to anchor herself, to fan her ego via his devotion, and a source of satisfaction for her. In The Rise of Polyandry: Exploring Modern Marriage Dynamics part 1 you’ve outlined how polygamy and polygyny controls and oppresses women as below:
Therefore I’m interested in how in a polyandrous relationship where one man or NB partner is secondary on both the woman’s ladders, would be any different to following disadvantages oh polygamy
The secondary partner would in my mind feel jealous and unstable and would be unlikely to simply accept this due to some imagined pride in being a
and again I feel that he would not take any satisfaction on becoming
From a personal level if I just saw myself providing devotion, utility, being an anchor and holding space for her growth without any regard for my own wellbeing since she no longer prioritises or cares for me then I depending on how long it lasted I would be leaving that relationship. Your example of a parent feeling closer to one child or another, is I feel a false comparison since good parents do their utmost to hide any preferences because of their instinctual need to protect and care for their children and also because most children would lack the emotional experience and intelligence to identify such an emotional imbalance when the parent was hiding it well.
Whereas in a theoretical throuple the rejected adult would have many many years to develop the skills needed to notice they’re suddenly no longer a priority, especially where jealousy and possession would be involved and thus would be heightening their senses for such things. Therefore it’s likely that unless the rejected partner is reminded quickly that
They will quickly feel rejected and leave. However since the woman and the other person (man or NB) are no longer prioritising the 3rd person, the chances are they won’t even notice the hurt, jealousy and rejection they’re causing, thus allowing anger and bitterness to build until it reaches a point whereby no amount of talking will rescue the relationship.
Your point about a hierarchy is valid, as long as one person isn’t at the bottom in everything. You quite rightly say that the answer is balance, however since there already is an imbalance, which the rejected person feels most keenly, I’m unsure how a balance can be restored before the third person feels utterly rejected and wants to leave the polyandrous relationship.